Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BAILEY v. CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF NORTH LAS VEGAS, 2:13-CV-343 JCM (CWH). (2013)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20130612c25 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jun. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2013
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. Presently before the court is pro se prisoner plaintiff's motion for default judgment. (Doc. # 11). Plaintiff moves for default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55. Plaintiff does not state which defendant he seeks default against or why default is appropriate. Plaintiff states that he "demand[s] judgment . . . unless, the court can demonstrate through the [Ninth] Circuit Court of Appeals case law or this court's case law, that default
More

ORDER

JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.

Presently before the court is pro se prisoner plaintiff's motion for default judgment. (Doc. # 11).

Plaintiff moves for default judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55. Plaintiff does not state which defendant he seeks default against or why default is appropriate. Plaintiff states that he "demand[s] judgment . . . unless, the court can demonstrate through the [Ninth] Circuit Court of Appeals case law or this court's case law, that default is non-existence (sic)." (Doc. # 11).

The court finds no reason to grant default. Every defendant has appeared in this case and answered the complaint. The motion is denied.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, DECREED that plaintiff's motion for default judgment (doc. # 11) be, and the same hereby, is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer