RAPAPORT v. SOFFER, 2:10-cv-00935-MMD-NJK (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20130619d05
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 17, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2013
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge. On February 1, 2013, the Court previously stayed proceedings in these cases pending resolution of Defendant/Counterclaimant Avi Soffer's bankruptcy petition or a lifting of the automatic stay. ( See dkt. no. 104.) The Court denied without prejudice numerous pending motions in both cases, and instructed the parties to seek their reinstatement when the stay is lifted. Plaintiff Ezriel Rapaport now moves to lift the stay based on the bankruptcy court's Order
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge. On February 1, 2013, the Court previously stayed proceedings in these cases pending resolution of Defendant/Counterclaimant Avi Soffer's bankruptcy petition or a lifting of the automatic stay. ( See dkt. no. 104.) The Court denied without prejudice numerous pending motions in both cases, and instructed the parties to seek their reinstatement when the stay is lifted. Plaintiff Ezriel Rapaport now moves to lift the stay based on the bankruptcy court's Order ..
More
ORDER
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
On February 1, 2013, the Court previously stayed proceedings in these cases pending resolution of Defendant/Counterclaimant Avi Soffer's bankruptcy petition or a lifting of the automatic stay. (See dkt. no. 104.) The Court denied without prejudice numerous pending motions in both cases, and instructed the parties to seek their reinstatement when the stay is lifted.
Plaintiff Ezriel Rapaport now moves to lift the stay based on the bankruptcy court's Order Granting Creditor Ezriel Rapaport's Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay. (See dkt. nos. 109, 112.) Rapaport also seeks to reinstate the previously denied motions.
Good cause appearing, Rapaport's Motion to Reinstate Motions (dkt. no. 112) is GRANTED. The stay of this proceeding is now LIFTED. Responses to Soffer's Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (dkt. no. 102) are due within fourteen (14) days from the entry of this Order. With respect to the remaining undecided motions, the parties are to file a joint status report within fourteen (14) days of from the entry of this Order outlining the status of this case, the progress of discovery, and all undecided motions that require Court attention.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
