HUNT v. WILLIAMS, 3:13-cv-00040-MMD-WGC. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20130627e25
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2013
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge. The Court received a letter dated June 19, 2013, from Petitioner Brian Hunt. It does not appear that the letter was served on respondents. Petitioner is admonished that ex parte communications with a judge are inappropriate in most circumstances. See Local Rules, Part II, LR 7-6. Moreover, a document requesting a Court order must be styled as a motion, not a letter ( see F.R.C.P. 7). Letters to a judge will be disregarded. While the Court directed for
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge. The Court received a letter dated June 19, 2013, from Petitioner Brian Hunt. It does not appear that the letter was served on respondents. Petitioner is admonished that ex parte communications with a judge are inappropriate in most circumstances. See Local Rules, Part II, LR 7-6. Moreover, a document requesting a Court order must be styled as a motion, not a letter ( see F.R.C.P. 7). Letters to a judge will be disregarded. While the Court directed for t..
More
ORDER
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
The Court received a letter dated June 19, 2013, from Petitioner Brian Hunt. It does not appear that the letter was served on respondents. Petitioner is admonished that ex parte communications with a judge are inappropriate in most circumstances. See Local Rules, Part II, LR 7-6. Moreover, a document requesting a Court order must be styled as a motion, not a letter (see F.R.C.P. 7). Letters to a judge will be disregarded. While the Court directed for the June 19, 2013, letter to be filed, the Court will not take any action in response to the letter.
Source: Leagle
