BERMAN v. COLVIN, 2:12-cv-1816-PMP-PAL. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20130731e06
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 30, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 30, 2013
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. The Court having read and considered Plaintiffs' Objections (Doc. #9) to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #8) of the Honorable Peggy A. Leen, United States Magistrate Judge, and Defendants Response thereto (Doc. #10), and having conducted a de novo review of the proceedings, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. #9) are overruled, and the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #8) is Affirmed. IT IS FURTHER
Summary: ORDER PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge. The Court having read and considered Plaintiffs' Objections (Doc. #9) to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #8) of the Honorable Peggy A. Leen, United States Magistrate Judge, and Defendants Response thereto (Doc. #10), and having conducted a de novo review of the proceedings, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. #9) are overruled, and the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #8) is Affirmed. IT IS FURTHER ..
More
ORDER
PHILIP M. PRO, District Judge.
The Court having read and considered Plaintiffs' Objections (Doc. #9) to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. #8) of the Honorable Peggy A. Leen, United States Magistrate Judge, and Defendants Response thereto (Doc. #10), and having conducted a de novo review of the proceedings, and good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Objections (Doc. #9) are overruled, and the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. #8) is Affirmed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Colvin's Motion to Remand (Doc. #5) is Granted as follows:
This action be remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for a de novo hearing before an ALJ within ninety days.
Source: Leagle