Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

RICH v. TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC., 2:09-CV-2450 JCM (NJK). (2013)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20130807b28 Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 06, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2013
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. Presently before the court is defendant Taser International, Inc.'s motion for leave to file reply in support of motion in limine. (Doc. # 182). The motion has been filed pursuant to Local Rule 16-3(b), which states that "[r]eplies will be allowed only with leave of the Court." Defendant argues that a reply is warranted because plaintiff Randy Rich, et al. 's response exceeded the 30-page limit and raised new issues. Having briefly reviewed the response,
More

ORDER

JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.

Presently before the court is defendant Taser International, Inc.'s motion for leave to file reply in support of motion in limine. (Doc. # 182). The motion has been filed pursuant to Local Rule 16-3(b), which states that "[r]eplies will be allowed only with leave of the Court."

Defendant argues that a reply is warranted because plaintiff Randy Rich, et al.'s response exceeded the 30-page limit and raised new issues. Having briefly reviewed the response, the court agrees.

Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendant Taser International, Inc.'s motion for leave to file reply in support of motion in limine (doc. # 182) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that defendant file the reply (doc. # 182-1) within seven days of entry of this order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer