Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. JOHNSON, 2:10-cv-2203-MMD-GWF. (2013)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20130816b93 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 12, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2013
Summary: STIPULATED MOTION TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF JEREMY JOHNSON ON SEPTEMBER 5, 2013 GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge. By this stipulated motion, the parties move the Court to allow them to take the deposition of Jeremy Johnson on September 5, 2013. This date is beyond the regular fact discovery deadline. However, availability issues regarding counsel have arisen that the parties have been unable to work around. Pursuant to a previous order of Judge Du, the parties were permitted to take anothe
More

STIPULATED MOTION TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION OF JEREMY JOHNSON ON SEPTEMBER 5, 2013

GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge.

By this stipulated motion, the parties move the Court to allow them to take the deposition of Jeremy Johnson on September 5, 2013. This date is beyond the regular fact discovery deadline. However, availability issues regarding counsel have arisen that the parties have been unable to work around. Pursuant to a previous order of Judge Du, the parties were permitted to take another deposition (Scott Leavitt) by the end of August. However, Mr. Leavitt's counsel is unavailable during the last week of August. He, therefore, requested that the FTC agree to depose Mr. Leavitt on September 6. The FTC noted to Mr. Leavitt's counsel that it could not justify separate trips for Mr. Leavitt and Mr. Johnson's depositions. Thus, the FTC conditioned agreeing to stipulate to depose Mr. Leavitt on September 6 on Mr. Johnson's depositions being held on September 5. IWorks has no objection to this schedule, and agrees that it would be convenient for all parties to have the deposition of Mr. Johnson taken at around the same time.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer