THE COUNTY OF CLARK v. ATKIN, 2:12-cv-00648. (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20131017d45
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 16, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2013
Summary: ORDER KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge. The Court, having reviewed the JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS THE DEFENDANT UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND TO REMAND ACTION TO THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF NEVADA, and good cause appearing, hereby orders as follows: 1. The Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, as to the Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company only, the Plaintiff and the Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company to bear their respective attorney fees and c
Summary: ORDER KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge. The Court, having reviewed the JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS THE DEFENDANT UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND TO REMAND ACTION TO THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF NEVADA, and good cause appearing, hereby orders as follows: 1. The Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, as to the Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company only, the Plaintiff and the Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company to bear their respective attorney fees and co..
More
ORDER
KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.
The Court, having reviewed the JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS THE DEFENDANT UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND TO REMAND ACTION TO THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF NEVADA, and good cause appearing, hereby orders as follows:
1. The Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, as to the Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company only, the Plaintiff and the Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company to bear their respective attorney fees and costs of suit;
2. The remaining action is hereby remanded to the Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County, Nevada, for all further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
