VONTOBEL v. BENEDETTI, 3:10-cv-00073-LRH-VPC. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150107a22
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 06, 2015
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. The court stayed this action while petitioner returned to state court to pursue post-conviction relief. Those proceedings have concluded, and petitioner has filed a motion to reopen (#51). Good cause appearing; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion to reopen case (#51) is GRANTED. This action is REINSTATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the date on which this order is entered to answer or othe
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. The court stayed this action while petitioner returned to state court to pursue post-conviction relief. Those proceedings have concluded, and petitioner has filed a motion to reopen (#51). Good cause appearing; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion to reopen case (#51) is GRANTED. This action is REINSTATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the date on which this order is entered to answer or other..
More
ORDER
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
The court stayed this action while petitioner returned to state court to pursue post-conviction relief. Those proceedings have concluded, and petitioner has filed a motion to reopen (#51). Good cause appearing;
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's motion to reopen case (#51) is GRANTED. This action is REINSTATED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall have forty-five (45) days from the date on which this order is entered to answer or otherwise respond to the first amended petition (#23). If respondents file and serve an answer, then they shall comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, and then petitioner shall have forty-five (45) days from the date on which the answer is served to file a reply.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the exhibits filed in the court's docket at #52 shall be considered as additional exhibits to the first amended petition (#23).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, from this date forward, the hard copy of any exhibits shall be forwarded—for this case—to the staff attorneys in Las Vegas.
Source: Leagle
