Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Clark County, 2:14-CV-00493-RFB-NJK. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150113a67 Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO WITHDRAW THE MOTION TO INTERVENE (Dkt. 24) NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge. Defendant CLARK COUNTY ("Defendant"), Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ("Plaintiff"), and Therese Scupi ("Ms. Scupi") by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit the following Joint Interim Status Report, and request to withdraw the Motion to Intervene as moot. On January 7, 2015, this Court ordered the Parties to submit this Joint Status Report regarding the Motion to
More

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO WITHDRAW THE MOTION TO INTERVENE (Dkt. 24)

NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.

Defendant CLARK COUNTY ("Defendant"), Plaintiff UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ("Plaintiff"), and Therese Scupi ("Ms. Scupi") by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit the following Joint Interim Status Report, and request to withdraw the Motion to Intervene as moot.

On January 7, 2015, this Court ordered the Parties to submit this Joint Status Report regarding the Motion to Intervene (Dkt. 24) and whether it has been rendered moot by any settlement agreement. (Dkt. 40).

On October 25, 2014, Therese Scupi filed the Charging Party's Motion for Leave to Intervene Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 24(a) and 42 U.S.C. §2003-5(f)(1) (the "Motion") seeking leave to intervene as the charging party upon whose charges of discrimination and retaliation (the Charges") the United States of America based its Complaint (Dkt. 1) in the above captioned matter;

On November 24, 2014, Clark County timely filed its Opposition to the Motion (Dkt. 34) and on December 4, 2014, Ms. Scupi filed a Reply (Dkt. 36). Plaintiff did not file an opposition to the Motion.

On December 16, 2014 Ms. Scupi executed a Settlement Agreement and General Release (the "Settlement"), in which Ms. Scupi released Clark County from all claims against Clark County, including claims of liability for the allegations raised in her Charges, regardless of whether the claims are asserted by Ms. Scupi or by another party.

The Settlement renders the Motion moot and Ms. Scupi no longer desires to intervene in this matter. The Plaintiff and the Defendant intend to file a joint proposed consent decree referencing the settlement agreement and resolving the matter.

Based upon the foregoing, Defendant, Plaintiff, and Ms. Scupi, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and request to withdraw Ms. Scupi's Motion to Intervene. (Dkt. 24).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer