Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HAKKASAN LV, LLC v. ADAMCZYK, 2:14-cv-01717-GMN-NJK. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150122c11 Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 27. The Local Rules require the parties to participate in a conference regarding discovery and submit a joint discovery plan to the Court. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f); Local Rule 26-1(d). The pending discovery plan indicates that Defendant Adamcyzk refused to participate in the Rule 26(f) conference or in the submission of the discovery plan. See Docket No. 27 at 1-2.
More

ORDER

NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' proposed discovery plan. Docket No. 27. The Local Rules require the parties to participate in a conference regarding discovery and submit a joint discovery plan to the Court. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f); Local Rule 26-1(d). The pending discovery plan indicates that Defendant Adamcyzk refused to participate in the Rule 26(f) conference or in the submission of the discovery plan. See Docket No. 27 at 1-2. The pending discovery plan is hereby DENIED.

The Court hereby ORDERS Defendant Adamcyzk to contact Plaintiffs' counsel by telephone, no later than January 28, 2015, to arrange a time and date to hold the Rule 26(f) conference. Defendant Adamcyzk is further ORDERED to participate in the preparing of a proposed discovery plan. The parties are lastly ORDERED to file a proposed discovery plan no later than February 4, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer