Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Ellis, 2:13-CR-258-JAD(GWF). (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150122c17 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between JESS R. MARCHESE, ESQ. Counsel for Defendant DANNY ELLIS and ROBERT KNIEF, Assistant United States Attorney, that sentencing currently scheduled for January 21, 2015 at and reset to a date and time convenient to the court. This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons 1. Counsel for the defendant has spoken to his client and he has no objection to t
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between JESS R. MARCHESE, ESQ. Counsel for Defendant DANNY ELLIS and ROBERT KNIEF, Assistant United States Attorney, that sentencing currently scheduled for January 21, 2015 at and reset to a date and time convenient to the court.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons

1. Counsel for the defendant has spoken to his client and he has no objection to the request for continuance. 2. Counsel for the defendant has spoken to AUSA Robert Knief and he has no objection to the continuance.

3. The defendant has not met with the government yet in order to meet his Safety Valve eligibility requirements.

4. For all the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the sentencing until a date and time convenient to the court.

This is the second request for continuance filed for this hearing.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds:

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Counsel for the defendant has spoken to his client and he has no objection to the request for continuance. 2. Counsel for the defendant has spoken to AUSA Robert Knief and he has no objection to the continuance. 3. The defendant has not met with the government yet in order to meet his Safety Valve eligibility requirements. 4. For all the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the sentencing until a date and time convenient to the court.

This is the second request for continuance filed for this hearing.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the sentencing currently scheduled for January 21, 2015, at 9:00 a.m., be continued to Monday, March 16, 2015, at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom #6D.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer