Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Rodriguez v. AT&T Services, Inc., 2:14-cv-01537-GMN. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150123d38 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2015
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION (THIRD REQUEST) GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge. Defendant AT&T Services, Inc. ("AT&T") and Plaintiff Juan Rodriguez respectfully submit this amended stipulation under Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1 for an extension of time for Defendant to file its reply brief in support of its motion to compel arbitration. 1. AT&T was served in this action on September 25
More

AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE ITS REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION (THIRD REQUEST)

GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge.

Defendant AT&T Services, Inc. ("AT&T") and Plaintiff Juan Rodriguez respectfully submit this amended stipulation under Local Rules 6-1 and 7-1 for an extension of time for Defendant to file its reply brief in support of its motion to compel arbitration.

1. AT&T was served in this action on September 25, 2014.

2. The Court granted the parties' stipulation to extend the time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to November 17, 2014. Dkt. # 6.

3. AT&T filed its Motion to Compel Arbitration on November 17, 2014. Dkt. # 11.

4. The Court granted the parties' stipulation to extend the time for Rodriguez to file his response brief to December 18, 2014, and to extend the time for AT&T to file its reply brief to January 9, 2015. Dkt. # 16.

5. Rodriguez filed his response brief on December 18, 2014. Dkt. # 17.

6. The parties agreed to extend by seven days the time for AT&T to file its reply brief, in light of commitments that arose since the parties' last stipulation.

7. This stipulated extension, which is AT&T's third such request in this case, is sought in good faith and not for purposes of undue delay or unfair prejudice.

8. AT&T filed its reply brief in support of its motion to compel arbitration on January 16, 2015. Dkt. # 21.

9. On January 21, 2015, the Court ordered the parties to file an Amended Stipulation clarifying the requested relief. Dkt. # 22. The parties hereby file this Amended Stipulation to clarify that AT&T's initial response to the Complaint was its motion to compel arbitration, and that they are requesting in this Amended Stipulation that the time for AT&T to file its reply brief in support of its motion to compel arbitration be extended to January 16, 2015, and AT&T has now filed the reply brief.

10. The parties apologize for any confusion and inconvenience to the Court.

WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate and jointly request that this Court grant the following relief:

• AT&T shall have an extension of time to and including January 16, 2015, to file its reply brief in support of its motion to compel arbitration; • Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer