Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

RICHARDSON v. LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, 2:13-cv-01481-JCM-VCF. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150128f57 Visitors: 6
Filed: Jan. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 22, 2015
Summary: ORDER CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge. Before the court is Defendants' Motion to Extend Discovery. (#43). Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), "the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion." Here, no opposition has been filed. The time to file an opposition has passed. Accordingly, and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Extend Discovery (#43) is GRANTED. IT IS
More

ORDER

CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.

Before the court is Defendants' Motion to Extend Discovery. (#43).

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), "the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion." Here, no opposition has been filed. The time to file an opposition has passed.

Accordingly, and for good cause shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Extend Discovery (#43) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following deadlines apply:

1. Discovery in this action must be completed on or before February 3, 2015, 2. Dispositive Motions must be filed and served no later than March 9, 2015, 3. The Joint Pretrial Order is due thirty (30) days after the dispositive motions deadline, or on April 3, 2015. If dispositive motions are filed, the joint pretrial order is due thirty (30) days from the entry of the court's rulings on the motions or by further order of the court.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer