HENDRIX v. STATE, 2:13-cv-01527-JAD-CWH. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150209898
Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2015
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants Dr. Elizabeth Neighbors, Dr. Richard Bissett, and Tom Durante's ("defendants") Motion for a HIPPA Compliant Protective Order (doc. # 72), filed January 15, 2015. Defendant Howard H. Henson ("Henson") filed a Statement of Non-Opposition (doc. # 73) to the instant motion, while other parties failed to file a response. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), "[t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and au
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendants Dr. Elizabeth Neighbors, Dr. Richard Bissett, and Tom Durante's ("defendants") Motion for a HIPPA Compliant Protective Order (doc. # 72), filed January 15, 2015. Defendant Howard H. Henson ("Henson") filed a Statement of Non-Opposition (doc. # 73) to the instant motion, while other parties failed to file a response. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), "[t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and aut..
More
ORDER
C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants Dr. Elizabeth Neighbors, Dr. Richard Bissett, and Tom Durante's ("defendants") Motion for a HIPPA Compliant Protective Order (doc. # 72), filed January 15, 2015. Defendant Howard H. Henson ("Henson") filed a Statement of Non-Opposition (doc. # 73) to the instant motion, while other parties failed to file a response.
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), "[t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion." Given that Henson has indicated his non-opposition and other parties failed to file a response to the instant motion, defendants' motion is granted.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants' Motion for a HIPPA Compliant Protective Order (doc. # 72) is granted. Defendants shall file a proposed protective order for this Court's review no later than February 20, 2015.
Source: Leagle
