Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. DE ARMAS DIAZ, 2:13-cr-148-JAD-GWF. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150217d34 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING DATE JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Daniel G. Bogden, United States Attorney, and Christina M. Brown, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and BRENDA WEKSLER, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for JULIO DE ARMAS DIAZ, OSVALDO E. FUMO, counsel for ALEXIS TORRES SIMON, and KATHLEEN BLISS, counsel for ALEXANDER
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING DATE

JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Daniel G. Bogden, United States Attorney, and Christina M. Brown, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and BRENDA WEKSLER, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for JULIO DE ARMAS DIAZ, OSVALDO E. FUMO, counsel for ALEXIS TORRES SIMON, and KATHLEEN BLISS, counsel for ALEXANDER DEL VALLE GARCIA, that the sentencing currently set for February 18, 2015 be continued to a date and time convenient to the court, however no sooner than seven (7

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons

1. The clients are in custody but do not oppose the continuance.

2. Counsel for Julio De Armas Diaz, will not be in the jurisdiction on the currently set date. Counsel for De Armas recently filed an additional pleading in regards to the proper guideline applications. In light of this, additional time is requested for all parties to prepare for sentencing.

3. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States § 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code §§ 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(ii).

4. This is the Sixth stipulation to continue sentencing filed herein.

ORDER

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore and the best interests of justice and judicial economy being:

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for February 18, 2015, at 9:00 a.m.; be vacated and continued to February 25, 2015 at the hours of 9:00 a.m. for De Armas Diaz; at the hour of 10:00 a.m. __, for Torres-Simon; and at the hour of __ 11:00 a.m. __, for Valle-Garcia

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer