Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gustin v. Plano Molding Company, 2:14-cv-00700-RCJ-CWH. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150313b98 Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT PLANO MOLDING COMPANY TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT DOSKOCIL MANUFACTURING COMPANY'S LIMITED OPPOSITION TO ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . The moving and opposing parties on the pending motion for summary judgment, Plano Molding Company and Doskocil Manufacturing Company, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that the deadline for Defendant Plano Molding Co
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT PLANO MOLDING COMPANY TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT DOSKOCIL MANUFACTURING COMPANY'S LIMITED OPPOSITION TO ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS

The moving and opposing parties on the pending motion for summary judgment, Plano Molding Company and Doskocil Manufacturing Company, by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that the deadline for Defendant Plano Molding Company to file its Reply to Defendant Doskocil Manufacturing Company's Limited Opposition to its Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Claims be extended from March 12, 2015, to March 25, 2015.

No prior extensions have been requested.

This extension is requested for two reasons: (1) the parties recently (February 24th) completed the second session deposition of Carmen Gustin (Plaintiff's mother), and Plano intends to use her testimony to argue in reply to the limited opposition. That transcript has not been prepared. And (2), Plano Molding Company's counsel will begin trial in Pima County Superior Court, Arizona in Tucson, Arizona on March 17, 2015. Counsel is expected in Tucson during the week March 9th, making the briefing schedule in this matter during the same week difficult. As a professional courtesy, Doskocil has agreed to the extension. The extension will cause prejudice to no party.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer