Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Diggs v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, 2:09-cv-02339-RLH-RJJ. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150317c72 Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2015
Summary: [SECOND] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROGER L. HUNT , District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff RONALD D. DIGGS (hereinafter "Plaintiff") by and through its counsel of record, Trevor J. Hatfield, Esq., and Defendants' counsel Lyssa A. Anderson, Esq., who do hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time to respond to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. #88 and #89). The parties and their counsel desire to extend the briefi
More

[SECOND] STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COMES NOW, Plaintiff RONALD D. DIGGS (hereinafter "Plaintiff") by and through its counsel of record, Trevor J. Hatfield, Esq., and Defendants' counsel Lyssa A. Anderson, Esq., who do hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time to respond to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. #88 and #89). The parties and their counsel desire to extend the briefing schedule of the time to respond and to reply to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment.

Accordingly, Plaintiff shall have up to and including March 20, 2015 to respond to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment, (Doc. #88 and #89). Defendants shall have until April 20, 2015 to file any Responses thereto.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer