U.S. v. LOPES-FLORES, 3:11-CR-00131-LRH-VPC (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150317c98
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER Defendant's Attorney: Nisha Brooks-Whittington Dated of Original Judgment: 10/11/2012 Date of Previous Amendment Judgment: 12/11/2012 LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . Upon motion of the Defendant and stipulation between the Defendant and the Government for a sentence reduction pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States
Summary: ORDER Defendant's Attorney: Nisha Brooks-Whittington Dated of Original Judgment: 10/11/2012 Date of Previous Amendment Judgment: 12/11/2012 LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . Upon motion of the Defendant and stipulation between the Defendant and the Government for a sentence reduction pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States ..
More
ORDER
Defendant's Attorney: Nisha Brooks-Whittington
Dated of Original Judgment: 10/11/2012
Date of Previous Amendment Judgment: 12/11/2012
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Upon motion of the Defendant and stipulation between the Defendant and the Government for a sentence reduction pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 994(u), and having such considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at United States Sentencing Guideline ¶ 1B1.10 and the sentencing factors set forth in Title 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent they are applicable,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and the defendant's previously imposed sentence of imprisonment of sixty (60) months is reduced to forty-eight (48) months. This modification shall not become effective until November 1, 2015.
Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated December 11, 2012, shall remain in effect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
