Diggs v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, 2:09-cv-02339-RLH-RJJ. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150323a05
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 20, 2015
Summary: THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLIES TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES ROGER L. HUNT , District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff RONALD D. DIGGS (hereinafter "Plaintiff") by and through its counsel of record, Trevor J. Hatfield, Esq., and Defendants' counsel Lyssa S. Anderson, Esq., who do hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' Motions for Summary J
Summary: THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLIES TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES ROGER L. HUNT , District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff RONALD D. DIGGS (hereinafter "Plaintiff") by and through its counsel of record, Trevor J. Hatfield, Esq., and Defendants' counsel Lyssa S. Anderson, Esq., who do hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' Motions for Summary Ju..
More
THIRD STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE REPLIES TO PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES
ROGER L. HUNT, District Judge.
COMES NOW, Plaintiff RONALD D. DIGGS (hereinafter "Plaintiff") by and through its counsel of record, Trevor J. Hatfield, Esq., and Defendants' counsel Lyssa S. Anderson, Esq., who do hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. #88 and #89). The parties and their counsel desire to extend the briefing schedule of the time to respond and to reply to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment to accommodate the professional schedules of the parties' counsel and due to the complexities of the issues presented in the attendant case.
Accordingly, Plaintiff shall have up to and including March 27, 2015 to respond to Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment, (Doc. #88 and #89). Defendants shall have until April 27, 2015 to file any Responses thereto.
IT IS SO ORDERED. and NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
