ELGHASEN v. ROYAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, 2:14-cv-01538-JAD-GWF (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150324f04
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. The Complaint (#1) in this matter was filed September 21, 2014 and the Amended Complaint (#8) was filed on December 5, 2014. Defendant Experian Information Solutions filed its Answer (#17) on January 5, 2015. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 d
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. The Complaint (#1) in this matter was filed September 21, 2014 and the Amended Complaint (#8) was filed on December 5, 2014. Defendant Experian Information Solutions filed its Answer (#17) on January 5, 2015. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 da..
More
ORDER
GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' failure to file a proposed Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. The Complaint (#1) in this matter was filed September 21, 2014 and the Amended Complaint (#8) was filed on December 5, 2014. Defendant Experian Information Solutions filed its Answer (#17) on January 5, 2015. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered or otherwise appeared, and 14 days thereafter to file a mandatory stipulated discovery plan and scheduling order. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order not later than April 1, 2015 in compliance with the provisions of LR 26-1 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
Source: Leagle
