U.S. v. PROKOP, 2:09-cr-00022-MMD-GWF. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150325d44
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . The Court has reviewed Defendants' proposed agenda for the sentencing hearing (dkt. no. 546). The Court adopts the agenda in part. The Court has reviewed Defendants' factual objections to the Presentence Investigation Report (dkt. nos. 532, 533, 536) and will issue its ruling at the start of the sentencing hearing. The Court anticipates that any argument with respect to the applicable burden of proof will not be lengthy as the parties have thoroughly b
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . The Court has reviewed Defendants' proposed agenda for the sentencing hearing (dkt. no. 546). The Court adopts the agenda in part. The Court has reviewed Defendants' factual objections to the Presentence Investigation Report (dkt. nos. 532, 533, 536) and will issue its ruling at the start of the sentencing hearing. The Court anticipates that any argument with respect to the applicable burden of proof will not be lengthy as the parties have thoroughly br..
More
ORDER
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed Defendants' proposed agenda for the sentencing hearing (dkt. no. 546). The Court adopts the agenda in part. The Court has reviewed Defendants' factual objections to the Presentence Investigation Report (dkt. nos. 532, 533, 536) and will issue its ruling at the start of the sentencing hearing. The Court anticipates that any argument with respect to the applicable burden of proof will not be lengthy as the parties have thoroughly briefed this issue. The Court further anticipates that items I-III of Defendants' proposed agenda will be addressed on March 9, 2015.
Source: Leagle
