Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Federal Trade Commission v. AMG Services, Inc., 2:12-cv-00536-GMN-VCF. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150409c86 Visitors: 17
Filed: Apr. 07, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR THE RELIEF DEFENDANTS TO SERVE THEIR RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND THIRD SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (First Request) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the Relief Defendants Kim C. Tucker ("Mrs. Tucker") and Park 269, LLC ("Park 269") (collectively the "Relief Defendants") and Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Plaintiff"), by and through their respe
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR THE RELIEF DEFENDANTS TO SERVE THEIR RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND THIRD SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS (First Request)

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2, the Relief Defendants Kim C. Tucker ("Mrs. Tucker") and Park 269, LLC ("Park 269") (collectively the "Relief Defendants") and Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission ("FTC" or "Plaintiff"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for the Relief Defendants to serve their objections and responses to the Plaintiff's Second Set of Interrogatories to Kim Tucker and Supplemental Interrogatory No. 6 to First Set of Interrogatories, Plaintiff's Second Set of Interrogatories to Park 269, LLC and Supplemental Interrogatory No. 4 to First Set of Interrogatories, and Plaintiff's Third Request for Production of Documents to Kim Tucker. The Relief Defendants' current deadline to serve responses and objections is April 8, 2015. Written discovery fact discovery closes on April 16, 2005. (ECF No. 644 at ¶ A.) The Parties agree and respectfully request the deadline for the Relief Defendants be extended to April 24, 2015.

This is the first request for an extension, which is necessitated by the inability of the accountants hired by the Relief Defendants to assist in responding to these requests during the height of tax season. This request is made in good faith due and is not interposed for any improper purpose or to delay.

The Parties further stipulate and agree that the Relief Defendants will not object to any subsequent efforts by the Plaintiff to meet and confer on the discovery responses, or any motion practice involving this discovery, on the basis that discovery has closed.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer