EXOBOX TECHNOLOGIES CORP. v. TSAMBIS, 2:14-cv-00501-RFB-VCF. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150413853
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to Serve the Summonses and Amended Complaint. (#132). Exobox seeks to extend the time to effect service of the Summonses and Amended Complaint upon those Defendants that have not been served. Id. Plaintiff has given sufficient reason to grant the extension of time to serve the summonses and amended complaint. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-5(c), [m]otions, applications or requests ma
Summary: ORDER CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to Serve the Summonses and Amended Complaint. (#132). Exobox seeks to extend the time to effect service of the Summonses and Amended Complaint upon those Defendants that have not been served. Id. Plaintiff has given sufficient reason to grant the extension of time to serve the summonses and amended complaint. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-5(c), [m]otions, applications or requests may..
More
ORDER
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Extension of Time to Serve the Summonses and Amended Complaint. (#132).
Exobox seeks to extend the time to effect service of the Summonses and Amended Complaint upon those Defendants that have not been served. Id. Plaintiff has given sufficient reason to grant the extension of time to serve the summonses and amended complaint.
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-5(c), [m]otions, applications or requests may be submitted ex parte only for compelling reasons, and not for unopposed or emergency motions. In the declaration of Zachary Takos, Exobox states that the instant motion is ex parte "because the relief sought does not impact or affect any of the Defendants who have been served in this matter." This is not a compelling reason to file the instant motion ex parte. This motion will not be deemed ex parte.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk will remove the ex parte status from the Motion for Extension of Time to Serve the Summonses and Amended Complaint (#132).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Extension of Time to Serve the Summonses and Amended Complaint (#132) is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
