Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Magana, 2:14-MJ-00719-VCF. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150424f14 Visitors: 23
Filed: Apr. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 23, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PRELIMINARY HEARING CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between DANIEL G. BOGDEN, United States Attorney, and AMBER M. CRAIG, counsel for the United States of America; ROBERT M. DRASKOVICH, counsel for Defendant, FIDEL ROMERO-SANCHEZ; JOHN MILLION TURCO, counsel for Defendant, MARCO MAGANA; MICHAEL I. GOWDEY, counsel for Defendant, ERNESTO SORIA-SARABIA; JOSHUA L. TOMSHECK, counsel for Defendant JAVIER LOERA-JUAREGUI; DONALD
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PRELIMINARY HEARING

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between DANIEL G. BOGDEN, United States Attorney, and AMBER M. CRAIG, counsel for the United States of America; ROBERT M. DRASKOVICH, counsel for Defendant, FIDEL ROMERO-SANCHEZ; JOHN MILLION TURCO, counsel for Defendant, MARCO MAGANA; MICHAEL I. GOWDEY, counsel for Defendant, ERNESTO SORIA-SARABIA; JOSHUA L. TOMSHECK, counsel for Defendant JAVIER LOERA-JUAREGUI; DONALD J. GREEN, counsel for Defendant, FRANCISCO DIAZ; and KAREN WINCKLER, counsel for Defendant GRISELDA PEREZ, that the preliminary hearing currently scheduled for April 24, 2015 at the hour of 4:00 p.m., be vacated for thirty (30) days, or to a date and time to be set by this Honorable Court.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Attorney Donald Green recently substituted in for Defendant Francisco Diaz.

2. The parties are attempting to resolve the case with a pre-indictment plea and require additional time to discuss the terms of the plea with the defendants.

3. Denial of this request for continuance of the preliminary hearing would prejudice both the defendants and the Government and unnecessarily consume this Court's valuable resources, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

5. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code §§ 3161(b) and 3161(h)(8)(A), considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code § 3161(h)(8)(B)(I) and (iv).

This is the sixth request to continue the preliminary hearing date filed herein.

ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY HEARING

Based upon the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court hereby finds that:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the preliminary hearing in the above-captioned matter currently scheduled for April 24, 2015 at 4:00 p.m., be vacated and continued to May 27, 2015 at the hour of 4:00 p.m..

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer