Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC v. SFR INVESTMENTS POOL I, LLC, 2:15:cv-00267-RFB-NJK. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150427951 Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION AND THE FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY TO RESPOND TO SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1 LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . COMES NATIONSTAR MORTAGE, LLC (hereinafter "Nationstar") and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTAGE ASSOCIATION ("Fannie Mae") on the one hand by and through their counsel of record Thomas N. Beckom, Esq of the law firm of McCarthy & Holthus LLP; the FEDERAL HOU
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION AND THE FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY TO RESPOND TO SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1 LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS

COMES NATIONSTAR MORTAGE, LLC (hereinafter "Nationstar") and FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTAGE ASSOCIATION ("Fannie Mae") on the one hand by and through their counsel of record Thomas N. Beckom, Esq of the law firm of McCarthy & Holthus LLP; the FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY ("FHFA") by and through their counsel of record Asim Varma, Esq of the law firm of Arnold and Porter LLP and Leslie Bryan Hart of the law firm of Fennemore Craig, P.C., and SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC by and through their counsel of record Jacqueline Gilbert, Esq of the law firm of Howard Kim and Associates and hereby file this Stipulation and Order Extending the Deadlines for Nationstar, Fannie Mae, and the FHFA to respond to SFR's Motion to Dismiss filed on April 17, 2015 pursuant to LR 6-1.

RECITALS

1. On April 17, 2015 SFR filed a Motion to Dismiss the Quiet Title Complaint filed by Nationstar, Fannie Mae, and the FHFA. Currently responses are due by May 4, 2015 and as such this stipulation has been filed timely pursuant to LR 6-1. 2. Nationstar, Fannie Mae, and the FHFA have not previously asked for extension to respond to this motion. 3. Nationstar, Fannie Mae, and the FHFA respectfully request additional time to respond to SFR's Motion as SFR, by way of the Motion to Dismiss, has raised new, important, and unique defenses to the application of certain federal statutes in the complaint. The resolution of these claims will have implications district wide to the current Homeowners Association foreclosure issue in light of the Nevada Supreme Court's opinion in SFR Invs. Pooll, LLC v. U.S. Bank N.A. 334 P.3d 408 (2014). 4. Given the importance and breadth of this issue, Nationstar, Fannie Mae, and the FHFA respectfully request additional time to brief this matter so that these legal issues may be properly presented to the court.

STIPULATION

It is hereby STIPULATED that Nationstar, Fannie Mae, and the FHFA shall have until June 3, 2015 to respond to SFR's Motion to Dismiss filed April 17, 2015.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer