Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Citelli, 2:12-cr-113-JCM-VCF. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150429f52 Visitors: 17
Filed: Apr. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 28, 2015
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . COMES NOW, the United States of America, by and through ANDREW WEISSMANN, Chief, U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section, and THOMAS B.W. HALL, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section, and moves to continue the sentencing hearing as to Paul Citelli presently set for calendar call on May 18, 2015, at the hour of 9:00 am. The parties respectfully request this H
More

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

COMES NOW, the United States of America, by and through ANDREW WEISSMANN, Chief, U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section, and THOMAS B.W. HALL, Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section, and moves to continue the sentencing hearing as to Paul Citelli presently set for calendar call on May 18, 2015, at the hour of 9:00 am.

The parties respectfully request this Honorable Court to continue Citelli's sentencing hearing until at least September 30, 2015 to allow time for the defendant to complete his cooperation in the case of United States v. Markham, Case No. 2:14-cr-00388-JCM-GWF, currently set for trial on August 24, 2015.

This is the fifth request for a continuance of this Sentencing date.

Pursuant to General Order No. 2007-04, this Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. The defendant has entered a plea agreement with the United States that requires the defendant to cooperate with the United States in connection with its ongoing investigation of a fraudulent scheme involving Las Vegas Home Owners Associations. The defendant is cooperating with the United States in this investigation, which involves a number of co-conspirators.

2. The defendant's Plea Agreement affords the defendant potential consideration for downward departures at the time of sentencing if the defendant has provided substantial assistance to the United States, including the possibility of a United States Sentencing Guideline (U.S.S.G.) § 5K1.1 Motion.

3. The United States anticipates at least one future trial related to this matter: United States v. Markham, Case No. 2:14-cr-00388-JCM-GWF, currently set for August 24, 2015. This trial may allow the defendant the opportunity to provide further cooperation as a witness, including the possibility of testifying at trial.

4. Counsel for the United States has spoken with counsel for the defendant and counsel has agreed that the requested continuance is in the best interest of justice, and counsel does not oppose the continuance sought herein. The defendant is not in custody.

5. Denial of this request for continuance would deny the parties sufficient time and opportunity to develop the defendant's cooperation against the related co-conspirators and targets and prepare related cases for prosecution.

6. Furthermore, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

Respectfully submitted.

ANDREW WEISSMANN Chief, U.S. Department of Justice Fraud Section, Criminal Division /s/ Thomas B.W. Hall THOMAS B.W. HALL Trial Attorney, U.S. Dept. of Justice Criminal Division, Fraud Section

PROPOSED ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the Government's pending Unopposed Motion to Continue Sentencing, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby finds that:

1. The parties are in agreement to continue the Sentencing date as presently scheduled. 2. This Court is convinced that an adequate showing has been made that to deny this request for continuance, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, would deny the United States sufficient time to be able to effectively prepare for the co-conspirator and target trials and would bar the defendant from the opportunity to cooperate and potentially receive downward departures at the time of sentencing. This decision is based on the following findings: a. The defendant agreed in his plea agreement to cooperate against his coconspirators in any related indictments and trials. b. The United States agreed to consider downward sentencing concessions for the defendant's cooperation, including possible U.S.S.G. 5K1.1 Motions if substantial assistance resulted from such cooperation. c. The United States anticipates several additional pleas, indictments and trials in related cases. Specifically, the defendant may be called to testify in United States v. Markham, Case No. 2:14-cr-00388-JCM-GWF, set for trial on August 24, 2015. d. The parties need additional time to prepare the defendant's cooperation against other co-conspirators and targets. e. The defendant does not object to the continuance. f. The defendant is out of custody. 3. For all the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by continuing the Sentencing date.

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Sentencing date currently set for May 18, 2015, is vacated and is continued. It is further ordered that the defendant's sentencing hearing is set for October 5 ____, 2015, at the hour of 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom # 6A __________.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer