BRIDGE v. CREDIT ONE FINANCIAL, 2:14-cv-01512-LDG-NJK. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150505d55
Visitors: 14
Filed: May 04, 2015
Latest Update: May 04, 2015
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendant's motion to seal. Docket No. 68. Defendant failed to provide specific facts supported by declarations or concrete examples to establish sufficient good cause for redacting page 135 of the deposition of Gary Harwood. See id. Accordingly, Defendant is ORDERED to provide supplemental briefing, no later than May 8, 2015, to establish, if it can, a "particularized showing" of "good cause" to redact page 135, suff
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Defendant's motion to seal. Docket No. 68. Defendant failed to provide specific facts supported by declarations or concrete examples to establish sufficient good cause for redacting page 135 of the deposition of Gary Harwood. See id. Accordingly, Defendant is ORDERED to provide supplemental briefing, no later than May 8, 2015, to establish, if it can, a "particularized showing" of "good cause" to redact page 135, suffi..
More
ORDER
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant's motion to seal. Docket No. 68. Defendant failed to provide specific facts supported by declarations or concrete examples to establish sufficient good cause for redacting page 135 of the deposition of Gary Harwood. See id. Accordingly, Defendant is ORDERED to provide supplemental briefing, no later than May 8, 2015, to establish, if it can, a "particularized showing" of "good cause" to redact page 135, sufficient to overcome the presumption of public access. See Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1137 (9th Cir. 2003)); see also Pintos v. Pac. Creditors Assoc., 605 F.3d 665, 678 (9th Cir. 2010).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle