Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. WESCOTT, 2:14-cr-00085-APG-CWH. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150603b92 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER C. W. HOFFMAN, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . This matter was referred to this Court on pro se Defendant Kenneth Gordon Wescott's ("defendant") motion in limine (doc. # 114), filed May 8, 2015. A review of the motion reveals that it is actually a supplement to defendant's motion to dismiss indictment (doc. # 59). As such, the Court construes the instant motion as a supplement, and denies the motion as moot because defendant's motion to dismiss indictment (doc. # 59) was already addresse
More

ORDER

This matter was referred to this Court on pro se Defendant Kenneth Gordon Wescott's ("defendant") motion in limine (doc. # 114), filed May 8, 2015.

A review of the motion reveals that it is actually a supplement to defendant's motion to dismiss indictment (doc. # 59). As such, the Court construes the instant motion as a supplement, and denies the motion as moot because defendant's motion to dismiss indictment (doc. # 59) was already addressed by this Court. See Doc. # 121 (district judge adopts the undersigned judge's report and recommendation (doc. # 86) granting defendant's motion to dismiss indictment, with the indictment dismissed without prejudice).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion in limine (doc. # 114), which this Court construes as a supplement to defendant's motion to dismiss indictment (doc. # 59), is denied as moot.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer