U.S. BANK, N.A. v. EMERALD RIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION, 2:15-cv-00117-MMD-PAL. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150608948
Visitors: 102
Filed: May 20, 2015
Latest Update: May 20, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR U.S. BANK TO FILE RESPONSE TO EMERALD RIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND COUNTER-CLAIMANT SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC'S COUNTERCLAIMS. (First Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . The parties respectfully submit the following Stipulation to allow Plaintiff U.S. Bank, N.A., successor trustee to Wachovia Bank, N.A., as trustee for the Certificateholders of Banc of America Funding Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Cert
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR U.S. BANK TO FILE RESPONSE TO EMERALD RIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND COUNTER-CLAIMANT SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC'S COUNTERCLAIMS. (First Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . The parties respectfully submit the following Stipulation to allow Plaintiff U.S. Bank, N.A., successor trustee to Wachovia Bank, N.A., as trustee for the Certificateholders of Banc of America Funding Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Certi..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR U.S. BANK TO FILE RESPONSE TO EMERALD RIDGE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND COUNTER-CLAIMANT SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC'S COUNTERCLAIMS.
(First Request)
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
The parties respectfully submit the following Stipulation to allow Plaintiff U.S. Bank, N.A., successor trustee to Wachovia Bank, N.A., as trustee for the Certificateholders of Banc of America Funding Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2004-C (U.S. Bank), additional time to file responses to both Defendant Emerald Ridge Landscape Maintenance Association's Motion to Dismiss, filed on April 24, 2015 [Dkt. 19], and Counter-claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC's Counterclaim, filed on April 23, 2015 [Dkt. 15]. U.S. Bank's responses are currently due on May 11, 2015 and May 14, 2015, respectively. The responses will now both be due on May 22, 2015. This stipulation is made in good faith, and is not anticipated to cause any delay to any party.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
