Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FRIAS HOLDING COMPANY v. GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP, 2:11-cv-160-GMN-VCF. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150615929 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES (#86) CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . This matter involves Frias Holding Company's legal-malpractice action against Greenberg Traurig. On April 24, 2015, Greenberg Traurig answered Frias Holding Company's complaint. See (Ans. #78). Frias Holding Company subsequently moved to strike Greenberg Traurig's first, fifth, and seventh affirmative defenses. (Mot. #86). On May 15, 2015, Greenberg Traurig filed an amended answer. (Am. Ans. #94). To dat
More

ORDER MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES (#86)

This matter involves Frias Holding Company's legal-malpractice action against Greenberg Traurig. On April 24, 2015, Greenberg Traurig answered Frias Holding Company's complaint. See (Ans. #78). Frias Holding Company subsequently moved to strike Greenberg Traurig's first, fifth, and seventh affirmative defenses. (Mot. #86). On May 15, 2015, Greenberg Traurig filed an amended answer. (Am. Ans. #94). To date, no party has opposed Frias Holding Company's Motion to Strike.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 governs amended pleadings. It states, "[a] party many amend its pleading once as a matter of course within [. . .] 21 days after serving it." FED. R. CIV. P. 15(a)(1)(A). Here, Greenberg Traurig filed an amended answer exactly 21 days after serving its initial pleading. This was proper under Rule 15 and renders Frias Holding Company's Motion to Strike (#86) moot.

ACCORDINGLY, and for good cause shown,

IT IS ORDERED that Frias Holding Company's Motion to Strike (#86) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer