MERRYMAN v. COLVIN, 2:14-CV-01499-KJD-VCF. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150616a50
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 11, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2015
Summary: ORDER KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#21) of Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach entered on April 28, 2015, recommending that the present case be remanded to determine whether Plaintiff's impairment is equivalent to a listed impairment under step 3 and whether Plaintiff's subjective testimony regarding her ability to work is credible. Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin filed an objection (#22) to the report and recommendation. Plai
Summary: ORDER KENT J. DAWSON , District Judge . Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#21) of Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach entered on April 28, 2015, recommending that the present case be remanded to determine whether Plaintiff's impairment is equivalent to a listed impairment under step 3 and whether Plaintiff's subjective testimony regarding her ability to work is credible. Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin filed an objection (#22) to the report and recommendation. Plain..
More
ORDER
KENT J. DAWSON, District Judge.
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (#21) of Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach entered on April 28, 2015, recommending that the present case be remanded to determine whether Plaintiff's impairment is equivalent to a listed impairment under step 3 and whether Plaintiff's subjective testimony regarding her ability to work is credible. Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin filed an objection (#22) to the report and recommendation. Plaintiff Ronda Merryman filed a response (#23).
This Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Report and Recommendation (#21) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered May 1, 2015, should be ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#21) entered April 28, 2015, are ADOPTED and AFFIRMED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Remand (#16) is GRANTED;
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendant's Cross Motion to Affirm (#17) is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
