HARVEY v. COLVIN, 2:14-cv-01742-JAD-CWH (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150629473
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION TO AFFIRM. CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . The parties jointly request to extend the time by thirty days from June 28, 2015 to July 28, 2015 for Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, to file her Cross-Motion To Affirm, with all other dates in this Court's Order Concerning Review Of Social Security Case extended accordingly. This is the Commissioner's first request for an extension.
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION TO AFFIRM. CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . The parties jointly request to extend the time by thirty days from June 28, 2015 to July 28, 2015 for Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, to file her Cross-Motion To Affirm, with all other dates in this Court's Order Concerning Review Of Social Security Case extended accordingly. This is the Commissioner's first request for an extension. T..
More
JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION TO AFFIRM.
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
The parties jointly request to extend the time by thirty days from June 28, 2015 to July 28, 2015 for Defendant Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, to file her Cross-Motion To Affirm, with all other dates in this Court's Order Concerning Review Of Social Security Case extended accordingly. This is the Commissioner's first request for an extension.
There is good cause for this extension because the Commissioner's counsel is handling a large number of other District Court cases. Further, counsel is preparing for a hearing in an administrative employment matter, which is set to occur in two weeks. Counsel has also been out of the office on official travel and will be traveling intermittently over the next several weeks. The Commissioner needs additional time to respond to the issues Plaintiff raised in his Motion For Reversal And/Or Remand. Plaintiff has no objection.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
