Filed: Jun. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR RESPONSES AND REPLIES TO DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS (First Request) LLOYD D. GEORGE , District Judge . Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 6, and Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1, the parties, by and through their undersigned attorneys of record, stipulate to a 10 day extension to the deadlines set for responding and replying to dispositive motions. The current response deadline is June 22, 2015; and the deadline for replies is currently set for July 6, 2015. The propo
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR RESPONSES AND REPLIES TO DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS (First Request) LLOYD D. GEORGE , District Judge . Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 6, and Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1, the parties, by and through their undersigned attorneys of record, stipulate to a 10 day extension to the deadlines set for responding and replying to dispositive motions. The current response deadline is June 22, 2015; and the deadline for replies is currently set for July 6, 2015. The propos..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR RESPONSES AND REPLIES TO DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS (First Request)
LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge.
Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 6, and Local Rules 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1, the parties, by and through their undersigned attorneys of record, stipulate to a 10 day extension to the deadlines set for responding and replying to dispositive motions. The current response deadline is June 22, 2015; and the deadline for replies is currently set for July 6, 2015. The proposed deadline for responses shall be July 2, 2015; and the deadline for replies shall be extended to July 16, 2015.
All the remaining parties in this case have stipulated to the extension. Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 6(b)(1), good cause exists for the extension because due to scheduling conflicts with discovery in other cases, i.e. pre-scheduled depositions, a mediation, and a client meeting involving out of state travel, attorneys for Champion and Mr. Durbin have been unable to meet the current response deadline. Counsel for Champion has conferred with the remaining parties in this case and none have objected to the extension.
In addition, there is no prejudice or any known conflict with potential trial dates.
ORDER
It is so ordered.
