Filed: Jun. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2015
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO ESCO'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS, STRIKE, SEVER & STAY [DKT 182] ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Plaintiffs ESCO Corporation and ESCO Canada Ltd. (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Cashman Equipment Company, Caterpillar Global Mining LLC, Caterpillar Inc., Raptor Mining Products, (USA), Inc. and Raptor Mining Products, Inc. (collectively "Defendants"), through their undersigned counsel of record, and pursu
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO ESCO'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS, STRIKE, SEVER & STAY [DKT 182] ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Plaintiffs ESCO Corporation and ESCO Canada Ltd. (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Cashman Equipment Company, Caterpillar Global Mining LLC, Caterpillar Inc., Raptor Mining Products, (USA), Inc. and Raptor Mining Products, Inc. (collectively "Defendants"), through their undersigned counsel of record, and pursua..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION TO ESCO'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS, STRIKE, SEVER & STAY [DKT 182]
ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
Plaintiffs ESCO Corporation and ESCO Canada Ltd. (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Cashman Equipment Company, Caterpillar Global Mining LLC, Caterpillar Inc., Raptor Mining Products, (USA), Inc. and Raptor Mining Products, Inc. (collectively "Defendants"), through their undersigned counsel of record, and pursuant to L.R. 6-1 and 7-1, hereby agree and stipulate to the Court's entry of an Order providing that Plaintiffs shall have a two week extension to file their reply to Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motions to Dismiss, Strike, Sever and Stay [Dkt 182], originally filed on June 22, 2015. Plaintiffs' reply is currently due on July 2, 2015. Defendants have now agreed to allow Plaintiffs two weeks of additional time to respond, making the reply due on July 16, 2015. The parties have not previously requested extensions regarding Plaintiffs' reply.
There is good cause for this stipulation, including the availability of Plaintiffs' counsel and the Fourth of July holiday. This extension is not requested for any improper purpose or delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
