FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. JOHNSON, 2:10-cv-02203-MMD-GWF. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150710a96
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 08, 2015
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Defendant Jeremy Johnson, proceeding pro se, has filed an ex parte motion to set aside the preliminary injunction order ("Motion). "(Dkt. no. 1625.) The Court has reviewed the first part of the Motin up to the "Introduction" Section (which begins on (which begins on page 2) where Johnson offers the reasons supporting his request to file his motion ex parte. The Court cannot be assured that the information offered in support of the Motion was prop
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Defendant Jeremy Johnson, proceeding pro se, has filed an ex parte motion to set aside the preliminary injunction order ("Motion). "(Dkt. no. 1625.) The Court has reviewed the first part of the Motin up to the "Introduction" Section (which begins on (which begins on page 2) where Johnson offers the reasons supporting his request to file his motion ex parte. The Court cannot be assured that the information offered in support of the Motion was prope..
More
ORDER
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Defendant Jeremy Johnson, proceeding pro se, has filed an ex parte motion to set aside the preliminary injunction order ("Motion). "(Dkt. no. 1625.) The Court has reviewed the first part of the Motin up to the "Introduction" Section (which begins on (which begins on page 2) where Johnson offers the reasons supporting his request to file his motion ex parte. The Court cannot be assured that the information offered in support of the Motion was properly obtained. For this reason, the Court has not reviewed the remainder of the Motion and will direct that the Motion be stricken. If the information offered in support of the Motion was not properly obtained, the information cannot be used as a basis to seek ex parte relief or any type of relief. If it was properly obtained, then there is no valid reason for the Court to consider Johnson's motion ex parte without notice to the other parties. To the extent Johnson is concerned about protecting confidential information, the appropriate means of protecting such information is to file a request to file under seal.
For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that Johnson's ex parte motion to set aside the preliminiary injunction order (dkt. no. 1625) is denied. It is further ordered that Johnson's ex parte motion (dkt. no. 1625) is stricken from the record.
Source: Leagle
