Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. WALKER, 2:15-cr-061-JCM-GWF. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150825997 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 24, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Daniel G. Bogden, United States Attorney, and Phillip N. Smith, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Heidi Ojeda, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Defendant ROBERT LEE WALKER, that the date for the Government to file a response to the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Docket #39) be extended for four
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Daniel G. Bogden, United States Attorney, and Phillip N. Smith, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Heidi Ojeda, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Defendant ROBERT LEE WALKER, that the date for the Government to file a response to the Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Docket #39) be extended for fourteen (14) days, and the date for the evidentiary hearing be adjusted accordingly.

This stipulation is entered for the following reasons

1. The Defendant's Motion was filed and served on August 4, 2015. PACER set the Government's deadline for on or before August 21, 2015. The parties' stipulation set the deadline for August 18, 2015. The Court scheduled an evidentiary hearing for September 10, 2015 atSee Docket #40.

2. Undersigned counsel has been preparing for trial in the matter of United Staters v. Antwan Fortenberry, case number 2:14-cr-387-JAD-NJK. The trial is presently scheduled to commence on August 25, 2015.

3. Undersigned counsel must conference with the involved officers in order to investigate the facts necessary to provide a meaningful response to the Defendant's Motion. Undersigned counsel is in the process of scheduling meetings with the involved officers and will need time to complete those interviews.

4. The Defendant is incarcerated, but he does not object to the continuance of the Government's response deadline.

5. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow the Government to have adequate time to prepare an appropriate response to the Defendant's Motion.

6. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

7. This is the first stipulation filed herein to continue the Government's response deadline.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. The Defendant's Motion was filed and served on August 4, 2015. PACER set the Government's deadline for on or before August 21, 2015. The parties' stipulation set the deadline for August 18, 2015. The Court scheduled an evidentiary hearing for September 10, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. See Docket #40.

2. Undersigned counsel has been preparing for trial in the matter of United States v. Antwan Fortenberry, case number 2:14-cr-387-JAD-NJK. The trial is presently scheduled to commence on August 25, 2015.

3. Undersigned counsel must conference with the involved officers in order to investigate the facts necessary to provide a meaningful response to the Defendant's Motion. Undersigned counsel is in the process of scheduling meetings with the involved officers and will need time to complete those interviews.

4. The Defendant is incarcerated, but he does not object to the continuance of the Government's response deadline.

5. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay. but merely to allow the Government to have adequate time to prepare an appropriate response to the Defendant's Motion.

6. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

7. This is the first stipulation filed herein to continue the Government's response deadline.

For all of the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the motion response deadline.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but merely to allow the parties sufficient time to allow the Government adequate time to prepare a response to the Defendant's Motion to Suppress, taking into account due diligence. The failure to grant said continuance would likely result in a miscarriage of justice.

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, that the previously-scheduled response deadline for the Government to respond to the Defendant's Motion to Suppress (Docket #39) is extended until September 2, 2015 and the evidentiary hearing currently scheduled for September 10, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. is continued until Monday, September 21, 2015 9:30 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer