Filed: Sep. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 02, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff, Michael R. Yazdi, by and through his counsel of record, the law firm of Marquis Aurbach Coffing, and Defendants, CST USA, Inc., CST Brands, Inc., CST Real Estate Holdings, LLC, CST Real Estate Holdings, Inc., CST Brands Holdings, Inc., and CST Brands Holdings, LLC ("Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record, t
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff, Michael R. Yazdi, by and through his counsel of record, the law firm of Marquis Aurbach Coffing, and Defendants, CST USA, Inc., CST Brands, Inc., CST Real Estate Holdings, LLC, CST Real Estate Holdings, Inc., CST Brands Holdings, Inc., and CST Brands Holdings, LLC ("Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record, th..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Michael R. Yazdi, by and through his counsel of record, the law firm of Marquis Aurbach Coffing, and Defendants, CST USA, Inc., CST Brands, Inc., CST Real Estate Holdings, LLC, CST Real Estate Holdings, Inc., CST Brands Holdings, Inc., and CST Brands Holdings, LLC ("Defendants"), by and through their counsel of record, the law firm of Greenberg Traurig, LLP, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. CST Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack for Personal Jurisdiction on August 14, 2015, Docket #18 (the "Defendants' Motion to Dismiss").
2. The Response to the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is currently due on or before August 31, 2015.
3. Plaintiff's counsel requires one additional week to prepare the Response because of other deadlines and workload issues.
4. Accordingly, the Parties agree to extend the Response deadline by one week, with the Response to be due on or before September 7, 2015 and any Reply thereto to be due on or before September 14, 2015.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that:
1. The Response to CST Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [#18] shall be filed on or before September 7, 2015; and
2. Any Reply shall be filed by September 14, 2015.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
