Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PRALL v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, 2:14-cv-01313-MMD-GWF. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150921738 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 29, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff MARILYN ELLEN PRALL and Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to dismiss specific allegations against Ford as follows: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Plaintiff is neither alleging that the left wrist fracture she sustained on or about September 8, 2014 is casually related to the subject accident nor is Plaintiff seeking to recover damages related to her left wrist
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER

Plaintiff MARILYN ELLEN PRALL and Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY, through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to dismiss specific allegations against Ford as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that Plaintiff is neither alleging that the left wrist fracture she sustained on or about September 8, 2014 is casually related to the subject accident nor is Plaintiff seeking to recover damages related to her left wrist injuries.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that Plaintiff's Third Claim for Relief for breach of express warranty, Plaintiff's Fourth Claim for Relief for breach of implied warranty of merchantability, and Plaintiff's Fifth Claim for Relief for breach of implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose be dismissed with prejudice.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer