Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

YOUNGMAN v. McGLADREY, LLP, 2:15-cv-01252-JCM-GWF. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150921751 Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 28, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 28, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Pursuant to LR 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1, Defendant McGladrey, LLP ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Matt Youngman ("Plaintiff") by and through their respective counsel, have agreed to an extension of time of seven (7) days for Defendant to file a Reply in support of Defendant's pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #4), which was filed on July 2, 2015. The cur
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST)

Pursuant to LR 6-1, 6-2, and 7-1, Defendant McGladrey, LLP ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Matt Youngman ("Plaintiff") by and through their respective counsel, have agreed to an extension of time of seven (7) days for Defendant to file a Reply in support of Defendant's pending Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #4), which was filed on July 2, 2015. The current deadline for Defendant to file a Reply is August 3, 2015. The 7-day extension would result in a new filing deadline of August 10, 2015.

This is the parties' first request and this Stipulation is made in good faith and is not intended for purposes of delay.

Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED that Defendant will have up to and including August 10, 2015, to file a Reply in support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 4).

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer