Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

KROSHUS v. U.S., (Adamson I) (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20151002s01 Visitors: 17
Filed: Sep. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2015
Summary: LLOYD D. GEORGE , District Judge . In conformity with the subdivision of pending motions for oral arguments and rulings announced by the court in its order of March 16, 2011, and in the further interests of case management of this litigation, THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that the following motions are DENIED without prejudice subject to their reinstatement by the court in the due course of the aforementioned proceedings: Kroshus v. United States, 3:08-cv-0246-LDG Plaintiffs' renewal and reins
More

In conformity with the subdivision of pending motions for oral arguments and rulings announced by the court in its order of March 16, 2011, and in the further interests of case management of this litigation,

THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that the following motions are DENIED without prejudice subject to their reinstatement by the court in the due course of the aforementioned proceedings:

Kroshus v. United States, 3:08-cv-0246-LDG Plaintiffs' renewal and reinstatement of motion for summary judgment on the issue of the Bureau of Reclamation's level of flows through the Truckee Canal (#879) Kroshus v. United States, 3:09-cv-0713-LDG Plaintiffs' renewal and reinstatement of motion for summary judgment regarding the level of flows through the Truckee Canal (#413)

The dispositive motions involving the United States are the next matters on this court's docket.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer