Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BRANAGAN v. NEVEN, 2:15-cv-01575-GMN-PAL. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20151006a03 Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2015
Summary: ORDER GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . This action is a petition for writ of habeas corpus. On August 17, 2015, the petitioner, Thomas Branagan, submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1), a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 2). On August 19, 2015, finding that Branagan is able to pay the $5.00 filing fee, the court denied his application to proceed in forma pauperis, and
More

ORDER

This action is a petition for writ of habeas corpus. On August 17, 2015, the petitioner, Thomas Branagan, submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1), a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and a motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 2).

On August 19, 2015, finding that Branagan is able to pay the $5.00 filing fee, the court denied his application to proceed in forma pauperis, and ordered Branagan to pay the filing fee within 30 days — by September 18, 2015. The court stated that failure to comply with that order would result in the dismissal of this action.

Branagan did not pay the filing fee by the September 18, 2015, deadline, and has not filed any other document.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 2) is denied as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, to the CM/ECF docket, as counsel for respondents. The Clerk of Court shall serve respondents with a copy of the habeas corpus petition (attached to the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1)), a copy of the August 19, 2015 order (ECF No. 3), and a copy of this order. Respondents need take no action with respect to this case.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer