Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. JOSHUA D. FLUSHMAN, D.C. LTD., 2:15-cv-01531-JAD-NJK. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20151009c95 Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO EXTEND (Docket No. 7) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend the deadline to file a response to Plaintiff's complaint. Docket No. 7. Stipulations for extensions must "state the reasons for the extension requested." Local Rule 6-1(b). The pending stipulation provides no reason whatsoever for the requested extension. Accordingly, it is hereby DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

ORDER DENYING STIPULATION TO EXTEND (Docket No. 7)

Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend the deadline to file a response to Plaintiff's complaint. Docket No. 7. Stipulations for extensions must "state the reasons for the extension requested." Local Rule 6-1(b). The pending stipulation provides no reason whatsoever for the requested extension. Accordingly, it is hereby DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer