Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ROCES v. RENO HOUSING AUTHORITY, 3:15-cv-00408-LRH-WGC. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20151030741 Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT GRANT PLAINTIFF (1) A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER UPON NOTICE AND/OR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT; (2) A STAY OF EVICTION PENDING HEARING ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Upon the declaration of Plaintiff Joaquin Roces, sworn to on August 25, 2015, and upon the memorandum of points and authorities filed herewith, upon all prior papers and proceedings on file in this action to date, and in consideration that in a few days from now,
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT GRANT PLAINTIFF (1) A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER UPON NOTICE AND/OR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST DEFENDANT; (2) A STAY OF EVICTION PENDING HEARING

Upon the declaration of Plaintiff Joaquin Roces, sworn to on August 25, 2015, and upon the memorandum of points and authorities filed herewith, upon all prior papers and proceedings on file in this action to date, and in consideration that in a few days from now, Plaintiff will be homeless as a result of pending eviction by Defendant RENO HOUSING AUTHORITY,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the above named defendant, RENO HOUSING AUTHORITY, appear before the Honorable Judge Robert C. Jones, Courtroom 6 of the United States Courthouse, located in the Bruce R. Thompson Federal Building, 400 South Virginia Street, Reno, Nevada 89501 at. 10:00 A.M. clock a.m./p.m. on Monday, August 31, 2015 thereafter as counsel may be heard, and then and there.

TO SHOW CAUSE, if any there be, why a temporary restraining order upon notice and/or a preliminary injunction pursuant to Sections 16(b) and 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 216(b), 217 (hereinafter FLSA) and/or pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure should not issue in the form submitted as a proposed order herewith,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this order, together with the papers upon which it is granted, be personally served upon the defendant(s) and/or its attorney by 5 p.m., Aug. 27. If Defendant's attorney has not entered an appearance in the case, and is not electronically served with this order, then hand delivery to the Defendant's principle place of business at 1525 E 9th St, Reno, NV 89512 shall be deemed good and sufficient notice and service.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all papers the Defendant desires to submit in opposition to the Plaintiff's motion must be served on counsel for Plaintiff (either electronically or by hand delivery) and filed with the court prior to the hearing date. Personal appearance is required and oral statements will be considered.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer