Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SALAT v. PIROTTO, 2:15-CV-01455 APG-PAL. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20151105945 Visitors: 12
Filed: Sep. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated by and between pro se Plaintiff, IMHOTEP SALAT aka IKON SAFIR, and Defendants M. PIROTTO and the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, by and through Defendants' attorneys, Jesse M. Rivera appearing pro hac vice in this Court after the Order at Doc. 19, and Kim Mandelbaum that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
More

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2)

It is hereby stipulated by and between pro se Plaintiff, IMHOTEP SALAT aka IKON SAFIR, and Defendants M. PIROTTO and the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, by and through Defendants' attorneys, Jesse M. Rivera appearing pro hac vice in this Court after the Order at Doc. 19, and Kim Mandelbaum that the above-entitled action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

This Stipulation for Dismissal encompasses all claims and all parties. Each party is to bear its own fees and costs, including all attorneys' fees.

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

This action against Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and MICHAEL PIROTTO is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP Rule 41(A)(2). All parties to bear their own costs and attorneys' fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer