Filed: Nov. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 12, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 26-4, and this Court's Order, dated November 3, 2015, Plaintiff Konami Gaming, Inc. ("Konami" or "Plaintiff") and Defendant Marks Studios, LLC d/b/a Gimmie Games ("Marks Studios" or Defendant") hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the parties to this action filed a proposed joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (the "Scheduling Order") on December 30, 2014,
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 26-4, and this Court's Order, dated November 3, 2015, Plaintiff Konami Gaming, Inc. ("Konami" or "Plaintiff") and Defendant Marks Studios, LLC d/b/a Gimmie Games ("Marks Studios" or Defendant") hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the parties to this action filed a proposed joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (the "Scheduling Order") on December 30, 2014, ..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 and 26-4, and this Court's Order, dated November 3, 2015, Plaintiff Konami Gaming, Inc. ("Konami" or "Plaintiff") and Defendant Marks Studios, LLC d/b/a Gimmie Games ("Marks Studios" or Defendant") hereby stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, the parties to this action filed a proposed joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (the "Scheduling Order") on December 30, 2014, (Docket no. 24);
WHEREAS, the Court so ordered the Scheduling Order on January 27, 2015 (Docket no. 31);
WHEREAS, to date, the Plaintiff and Defendant have made their Initial Disclosures pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) and have filed the Stipulated Protective Order required under Local Rule 16.1-4;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Scheduling Order, discovery is partially stayed until the Court issues a Markman order on claim construction.
WHEREAS, the Court approved the parties' most recent proposed modification of the Scheduling Order on October 19, 2015 (Docket No. 106):
WHEREAS, on November 3, 2015, this Court ordered the parties to file a stipulation that vacates the dates associated with present discovery schedule outlined in the Scheduling Order (the order is Docket No. 110);
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the named parties hereto, that the dates associated with the discovery schedule in the Scheduling Order (and any modifications to the dates therein) are vacated, including the dates for the claim construction briefs and expert reports;
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that the parties, within 30 days of this Court's November 3, 2015 Order, will submit a status report to the Court outlining the arrangements that have been made to depose Mr. Yoshimi and providing new dates in lieu of the dates that have been vacated by this stipulation and order;
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that nothing herein alters any other obligations and requirements included in the Scheduling Order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD,
ORDER
PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
