Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HOLOGRAM USA, INC. v. PULSE EVOLUTION CORPORATION, 2:14-cv-00772-GMN-NJK. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20151116787 Visitors: 11
Filed: Nov. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 09, 2015
Summary: AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANTS DICK CLARK PRODUCTIONS INC., MJJ PRODUCTIONS, INC., AND JOHN BRANCA AND JOHN McCLAIN IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL J. JACKSON GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION Plaintiffs Hologram USA, Inc., MDH Hologram Limited and Uwe Maass (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendants dick clark productions, inc., MJJ Productions, Inc., and John Branca and John McClai
More

AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANTS DICK CLARK PRODUCTIONS INC., MJJ PRODUCTIONS, INC., AND JOHN BRANCA AND JOHN McCLAIN IN THEIR CAPACITIES AS CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF MICHAEL J. JACKSON

AMENDED JOINT STIPULATION

Plaintiffs Hologram USA, Inc., MDH Hologram Limited and Uwe Maass (collectively, "Plaintiffs") and Defendants dick clark productions, inc., MJJ Productions, Inc., and John Branca and John McClain, in their capacities as co-executors of the Estate of Michael J. Jackson, (collectively, the "Jackson Defendants") (Plaintiffs and Defendants each a "Party" and collectively the "Parties"), by and through undersigned counsel and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, state as follows:

WHEREAS, on May 15, 2014, Plaintiffs filed this action (Dkt. No. 1);

WHEREAS, on January 30, 2015, Plaintiffs filed a Second Amended Complaint (Dk. No. 188) (the operative complaint in this case);

WHEREAS, on March 13, 2015, the Jackson Defendants, together with several other defendants in this action, filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 210), which remains pending before this Court;

WHEREAS, the Jackson Defendants have not answered the Second Amended Complaint;

WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), Plaintiffs and the Jackson Defendants have stipulated to a dismissal without prejudice of all claims asserted against the Jackson Defendants (and only the Jackson Defendants) in the above-entitled action, Case No. 14-cv-00772-GMN-NJK;

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiffs and the Jackson Defendants to this action and through their counsel of record that:

1. The Court shall dismiss all of the claims asserted against the Jackson Defendants in Case No. 14-cv-00772-GMN-NJK without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a).

2. Each Party will bear its own costs and attorneys' fees, except that the parties reserve all rights to seek the costs and fees incurred herein should the claims in the above-entitled action be re-filed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer