Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING, P.C. v. DORFMAN, 2:15-cv-00701-JCM-NJK. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20151116808 Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2015
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Presently before the court is defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint. (Doc. # 4). Plaintiff filed a response (doc. # 9), and defendants filed a reply. (Doc. # 11). Plaintiff filed its amended complaint on May 5, 2015, before filing its response to defendants' motion. (Doc. # 8). Defendants subsequently filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint (doc. # 13), which was denied by this court on October 20, 2015. (Doc. # 33). As
More

ORDER

Presently before the court is defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint. (Doc. # 4). Plaintiff filed a response (doc. # 9), and defendants filed a reply. (Doc. # 11).

Plaintiff filed its amended complaint on May 5, 2015, before filing its response to defendants' motion. (Doc. # 8). Defendants subsequently filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff's amended complaint (doc. # 13), which was denied by this court on October 20, 2015. (Doc. # 33).

As plaintiff has already filed an amended complaint, and this court has ruled on defendants' subsequent motion to dismiss, the instant motion is now moot.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. # 4) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer