Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Opportunity Homes, LLC v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, : 2:15-cv-000893-APG-GWF. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20151118b25 Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 17, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FIRST REQUEST GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Opportunity Homes, LLC ("Opportunity Homes"), Defendant/Counterclaimant, Federal Home Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac"), and Intervenor, Federal Housing Finance Agency ("FHFA"), by and through their attorneys of record, submit the following stipulation for the Court's review and approval. WHEREAS , Opportunity
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING RULING ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FIRST REQUEST

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, Opportunity Homes, LLC ("Opportunity Homes"), Defendant/Counterclaimant, Federal Home Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac"), and Intervenor, Federal Housing Finance Agency ("FHFA"), by and through their attorneys of record, submit the following stipulation for the Court's review and approval.

WHEREAS, Opportunity Homes filed its motion for summary judgment in the Eighth Judicial District Court of Clark County, Nevada on April 29, 2015.

WHEREAS, Freddie Mac removed this action to this Court on May 12, 2015. (Dkt. 1.)

WHEREAS, Freddie Mac and FHFA filed their joint motion for summary judgment on July 23, 2015. (Dkt. 19.)

WHEREAS, until the Court decides the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment, the parties agree to stay discovery, including the conference, discovery plan and report required by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("FRCP") and Rule 26-1(d) of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the District of Nevada ("LR"), and the initial disclosures required by FRCP 26(a).

WHEREAS, the parties agree that good cause exists to stay discovery in this action because the cross-motions for summary judgment raise a dispositive legal issue, the resolution of which will clarify what, if any, discovery is warranted.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the parties, through their undersigned counsel, pursuant to FRCP 26 and LR 6-2, 7-1, and 26-4, that all discovery is stayed pending rulings on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that, in the event the Court denies any of the cross-motions, the parties remaining in the above-captioned action after shall conduct the conference required by FRCP 26(f) (the "Rule 26(f) Conference"), and will submit the discovery plan and scheduling order required by FRCP 26(f) and LR 26-1(d) by no later than fourteen (14) days after the Rule 26(f) Conference.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this Stipulation is entered into in good faith and not for the purposes of delay, and is not intended to waive any of the substantive or procedural right of the parties. The parties have not previously requested any extensions of the discovery deadlines.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer