ROBERT C. JONES, District Judge.
The United States of America, by Assistant United States Attorney Elizabeth O. White, and Defendant Prudencio Uriarte-Acosta, by Assistant Federal Public Defender Nisha Brooks-Whittington, submit the following Joint Stipulation for Discretionary Relief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).
The parties agree and stipulate to the following:
Defendant was previously convicted and sentenced for offenses involving controlled substances.
On February 25, 2008, this Court sentenced Defendant to 216 months' imprisonment for conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846; and possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A)(viii). This Court previously found: (a) that Defendant's total offense level was 36; (2) that Defendant's criminal history category was I; and (c) that the guidelines sentencing range was 188-235 months' imprisonment. This Court imposed a sentence in the high-middle of the guidelines range.
Following imposition of sentence, the U.S. Sentencing Commission promulgated Amendment 782, which took effect on November 1, 2014. Amendment 782 (a) reduces the guidelines offense levels across all drug types, and (b) with certain limitations, applies retroactively to defendants sentenced prior to November 1, 2014.
Defendant seeks a discretionary reduction in sentence pursuant to Amendment 782, and in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) which (among other things) provides that, in certain circumstances, a sentencing court "may reduce the term of imprisonment." Pursuant to Amendment 788, sentencing reductions under Amendment 782 may not result in a defendant's release from BOP custody prior to November 1, 2015.
Defendant is eligible for a discretionary reduction to the guideline imprisonment range, and the parties agree that a reduction is appropriate. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Guidelines Amendment 782: (a) Defendant's revised total offense level is 34; (b) Defendant's criminal history category remains I; and (c), the revised advisory guidelines sentence is 151-188 months' imprisonment. Based on the foregoing, the parties jointly recommend that Defendant's sentence be reduced to 173 months' imprisonment, a sentence in the high middle of the revised guidelines range. The parties understand and stipulate that, if this reduced sentence would result in a release date prior to November 1, 2015, then the defendant will be ordered released on November 1, 2015.
Defendant knowingly and voluntarily waives any right to appeal any aspect of the revised sentence, except that, if the revised sentence exceeds the recommended term of 173 months, or November 1, 2015, whichever is later, Defendant may appeal that aspect of the revised sentence. See Declaration, attached as Exhibit 1.
Defendant (a) waives any right he may have to a hearing on his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); (b) waives any right he may have to attend such a hearing; (c) has reviewed this stipulation with defense counsel; and (d) agrees with and consents to this stipulation. See Declaration, attached as Exhibit 1.
Notwithstanding this Joint Stipulation, the United States expressly preserves and does not waive its contentions that a defendant seeking relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) has no constitutional or statutory right to counsel, to a hearing on the motion, or to be present at any hearing on the motion.
Based on the above, the parties respectfully request that the Court enter an order granting Defendant a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), and reducing his sentence to 173 months' imprisonment; with all other provisions of the judgment dated March 18, 2008, to remain in effect; and with an "effective date" of November 1, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.