BELL v. HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, 2:14-cv-00875-GMN-VCF. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20151125f27
Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 24, 2015
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE FERENBACH GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 39) of the Honorable Cam Ferenbach, United States Magistrate Judge, entered November 3, 2015. Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by November 20, 2014. No objections have been filed. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 1-4, the Court has reviewed the record in th
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE FERENBACH GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 39) of the Honorable Cam Ferenbach, United States Magistrate Judge, entered November 3, 2015. Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by November 20, 2014. No objections have been filed. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 1-4, the Court has reviewed the record in thi..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE FERENBACH
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge.
Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 39) of the Honorable Cam Ferenbach, United States Magistrate Judge, entered November 3, 2015.
Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by November 20, 2014. No objections have been filed. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 1-4, the Court has reviewed the record in this case and agrees with Magistrate Judge Ferenbach's recommendation to dismiss this case without prejudice to the filing of a new complaint for confirmation of an arbitrator's decision. Therefore, the Court has determined that Magistrate Judge Ferenbach's Recommendation should be ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 39) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. This case is dismissed without prejudice to the filing of a new complaint for confirmation of an arbitrator's decision.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Strike (ECF No. 35) is denied as moot.
The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case.
Source: Leagle
